16.2.2023

The Nordic energy transition goes on despite the energy shock

Energy lawyers are truly at the centre of action. Europe’s energy shock, set off by the war in Ukraine, flung energy markets to the centre of the attention of citizens, policymakers and the media. At the same time, the global climate crisis is calling for an urgent transformation of the energy system all over the world. Nora Steiner-Forsberg, General Counsel and member of the Executive Management team at the Nordic energy company Fortum, and Partner Samuli Tarkiainen from our Energy service discussed the energy transition in the Nordic countries and the role of lawyers.

‘The energy transition is the best solution to the current crisis. It is a way to reduce our carbon footprint and the dependency of Europe on the import of fossil fuels,’ says Nora.

The Nordic energy system has shown resilience to the energy shock, thanks to favourable natural conditions, a balanced mix of energy sources and good transfer connections between the countries. Power production in the Nordics has been almost fully decarbonised, with hydro and nuclear as the backbone and wind power growing fast.

What’s more, decarbonisation is well on its way in heating. District heating, which is the dominant technology, is undergoing a fuel switch from fossil fuels to forest biomass and recovered waste heat streams.

However, for entire societies to become carbon neutral, industry and transport need to be decarbonised as well. This will require even more emissions-free power and fuels. New capacity must be accompanied by modifications to the market model. Smart regulation can help bring these changes about.

‘You need to have different layers of regulation,’ Nora says. Right now, we are in the middle of the energy shock, and lawmakers must respond. Governments are intervening in the energy markets to cut power bills, and energy companies are bringing back coal power plants to secure the supply of energy.

Despite this setback, European regulators must not be diverted from the path towards carbon neutrality. In the medium and long term, it requires not only building more renewable capacity but also investing in power grids, developing the import infrastructure and transforming the demand side of the energy market.

In regulation, the USA is ahead of the pack with the Inflation Reduction Act. European lawmakers should also grasp the moment to transform the energy system.

‘I hope that the EU can manage the classifications in hydrogen so that we can really be in par with the US, because there will be a lot of competition,’ Samuli says.

Energy lawyers can play their part in shaping regulation. Firstly, lawyers can spread knowledge on the types of rules that would work best for the energy transition. Secondly, lawyers put the rules to practice and impact the efficiency of the regulatory system. Finally, since the energy transition must happen quickly, Nora stresses the importance of cooperation:

‘It is really important to keep good contact with your stakeholders, whether it is regulators, municipalities or other stakeholders. This will make processes faster and smoother. Of course, you need to be able to earn trust first, with accountability, transparency and working together to achieve the joint goals.’

Listen to Nora and Samuli’s talk on Legal500’s Global Green Hub for views on facilitating the energy transition with regulation and the elements of a balanced decarbonised energy system for Finland.

Latest references

We acted as legal advisor to eQ Fund Management Company Ltd in a structural arrangement in which Special Investment Fund eQ Residential Fund and Special Investment Fund eQ Residential Fund II transferred their assets to the newly launched Special Investment Fund eQ Residential Fund III. In connection with the arrangement, eQ Residential Fund III raised 37 million euros in new capital, and its fundraising will continue throughout 2025.  The portfolio of eQ Residential Fund III consists of 19 residential properties completed between 2021 and 2024, comprising nearly 1,400 apartments located in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Turku, and Tampere.
Case published 21.5.2025
We assisted eQ Community Properties Fund in the sale of two healthcare properties to a fund managed by Northern Horizon. The properties have a total floor area of approximately 3,500 square meters. The two properties are located in Espoo and Lahti. The Espoo asset was completed in 2018 and the Lahti asset was completed in 2023. Both assets are operated by Attendo, the leading care provider in the Nordic region.
Case published 9.5.2025
We successfully represented BMW in an exceptionally long dispute over whether the spare rims sold by the defendant and the hub caps included in them infringed BMW’s trademark and design rights. The Market Court found that the sign used by the defendant caused a likelihood of confusion with BMW’s trademarks. The defendant had used the sign on the hub caps and in the marketing of the hub caps and rims, leading the Market Court to find that the defendant had infringed BMW’s trademark rights. The defendant admitted to infringing BMW’s Community design but denied the related injunction claim. However, the Market Court found that there was no particular reason to refrain from issuing an injunction. The Market Court prohibited the defendant from continuing to infringe BMW’s trademarks and Community design and ordered the defendant to alter or destroy the products and marketing materials that infringed BMW’s rights. Furthermore, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay BMW EUR 70,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 80,000 in damages for the trademark infringements, as well as EUR 7,000 in reasonable compensation and EUR 8,000 in damages for the design right infringement. The amounts can be considered exceptionally high in Finland. Additionally, the Market Court ordered the defendant to pay a significant portion of BMW’s legal costs with interest on late payment. In its decision of 11 March 2025, the Supreme Court of Finland did not grant the defendant leave to appeal, and also decided that there was no need to seek a preliminary ruling from the Court of Justice of the European Union. Thus, the Market Court’s judgements (MAO:494/18 and 517/2023) are final. In addition to the main dispute, BMW demanded in a separate proceeding that one of the defendant’s trademark registrations be revoked. A total of three separate legal proceedings were conducted in the Market Court regarding the revocation. The defendant’s trademark registration was ultimately revoked.
Case published 9.5.2025
We are advising DNA Plc in brand protection and intellectual property enforcement matters globally. Our intellectual property team manages DNA’s global trademark portfolio, including registration, prosecution, opposition and enforcement. We also advise DNA in questions concerning consumer and marketing law, unfair competition, social media, domain names and cybersquatting. DNA Plc is one of Finland’s leading telecommunication companies. DNA offers connections, services and devices for homes and workplaces, contributing to the digitalisation of society. The company has approximately 3.7 million subscriptions in its fixed and mobile communications networks. In 2024, DNA’s total revenue was EUR 1,100 million, and the company employs about 1,600 people around Finland. DNA is part of Telenor Group.
Case published 7.5.2025