12.10.2016

The FCCA Clarifies the Assessment Criteria of Customer Bonus Schemes

Related services

The Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority (FCCA) gave a decision, on 11 October 2016, concerning the customer bonus scheme of S Group, a major grocery retailer in Finland. The FCCA determined that the scheme did not restrict competition, and concluded its investigation.  

The FCCA decision clarifies which factors are relevant when assessing the effects of customer bonus schemes of dominant companies on effective competition.

Customer Bonus Schemes are an Accepted and Common Means of Competition

The matter concerns the S Bonus scheme where bonuses are paid to a customer based on his purchases from a dominant company or its scheme partners. According to the FCCA’s decision, this kind of customer bonus scheme is to be assessed as a so-called conditional discount. Conditional discounts are a common form of price competition, which companies can employ to promote the demand for their products and to benefit their consumers. The FCCA decision states that conditional discounts granted by a dominant company can also have beneficial effects from the consumers’ perspective. A discount mechanism applied by a dominant company may, however, have a loyalty-enhancing effect which can, in some circumstances, lead to anticompetitive foreclosure effects in the market.   

Assessment of the Anticompetitive Foreclosure Effects

The assessment of the impacts of a customer bonus scheme is based on an overall assessment. The application of a scheme may amount to abuse of a dominant position if it prevents the expansion or entry of competitors that are as efficient as the dominant company or hinders the possibility of such competitors to fulfil a part of the purchase needs of individual customers.

According to the FCCA, this so-called as-efficient competitor test is, however, only one of the tools that can be used in assessing the effects of the discounts. Besides the costs, the FCCA also takes into account the following factors in its overall assessment:

Latest references

We advised CapMan Buyout in the exit of Renoa Group. Renoa Group management together with Korpi Capital and other investors have acquired the group. Renoa Group is a Finnish established expert in the building technology sector specializing in detached houses in Finland and Sweden. Renoa is a major provider of turnkey domestic water & heating, sewer system and electricity network renovations, with significant operations also in Sweden. The Group reported sales of €35 million and employed c. 300 personnel across its 10 offices in Finland and 6 in Sweden. Korpi Capital is a Finnish investment company with holdings in 29 companies. 
Case published 14.1.2025
We advised eQ Community Properties Fund in its acquisition of a property portfolio comprising a health centre in Espoo, a daycare property in Vantaa, an elementary school in Helsinki, and a parking facility property in Helsinki from Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company. The lettable area of the first three properties is approximately 13,900 sq.m., while the parking facility offers 120 parking spaces. The portfolio’s tenants include the City of Helsinki, the City of Vantaa, the Western Uusimaa Wellbeing Services County, and Aimo Park Oy. In connection with the transaction, Ilmarinen invested in eQ Community Properties fund as per 31 December 2024.
Case published 9.1.2025
We successfully represented a Finnish manufacturing company in arbitration proceedings under the SCC rules against a global construction company. The dispute was governed by Finnish law and the seat of arbitration was Stockholm, Sweden. The dispute mainly concerned the termination of an erection contract and the right to compensation for delays of the project and for cost increases due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The main questions in dispute were the lawfulness of the termination of the erection contract as well as the consequences of the termination such as the right to costs to complete the project after termination, the right to liquidated damages for delay of the project and adjustment of contract price due to cost increases. The total value of the dispute exceeded EUR 15 million.
Case published 8.1.2025
We advised Korkia Oy in its loan agreement with Nordic Environment Finance Corporation. The financing will support the development and international scale-up of Korkia’s pipeline of solar energy, battery energy storage system (BESS) and onshore wind projects. Korkia is a dedicated investor in renewable energy operating in nine countries. It has a robust development pipeline of over 20 GW in renewable energy and energy storage projects.
Case published 7.1.2025