24.5.2016

Private Enforcement of Competition Law under Revision in Finland – Legislative Proposal Given to Parliament on 19 May 2016

On 19 May 2016, the Government gave a Government Proposal (HE 83/2016 vp) to Parliament proposing an Act on Actions for Damages on the Basis of an Infringement of Competition Law and an Act on Amending the Competition Act, by which the EU directive on antitrust damages actions will be implemented.

A working group appointed by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy published a report proposing amendments to legislation last year (see News bulletin on 3 July 2015).

As opposed to the report, the Government Proposal did not include a proposition on economic succession of liability for damage. As such, the proposed act does not include provisions stipulating, for example, that in a transfer of business, the purchaser would also be obligated to pay damages caused by the target of the acquisition in the period preceding the transaction if the purchaser was aware or should have been aware of the infringement. Economic succession of liability for damage, thus, will be governed by legal praxis.

Otherwise the Government Proposal’s contents mainly correspond to the report. The Government Proposal includes provisions on, among other things, presumption of harm for cartels, burden of proof for passing on overcharges and on the impact of leniency on limitation of joint and several liability and recourse liability. In addition, the proposed act would regulate the impact of an infringement decision on damages actions, interest, presenting evidence, the impact of settlement on actions for damages and limitation periods.

In the Government Proposal, the burden of proof is reversed with respect to cartels; a cartel is expected to have caused damage, unless otherwise proven by the party to the infringement. The presumption of harm would only apply to cartels and, for example, in cases concerning the abuse of a dominant position, the plaintiff must prove that the restriction of competition has caused damage.

The proposed limitation period in the Government Proposal is five years from the date when a claimant has become aware, or should have become aware, of the infringement, the damage and the party responsible. The five year limitation period is, however, suspended for the duration of an investigation by the competition authorities, until one year has elapsed from the issuance of a binding decision, as well as for the duration of settlement negotiations. The right to damages does not, however, become time-barred if proceedings are brought within one year from the issuance of a binding decision or within ten years from the day of infringement of competition law or the end of a continued infringement. The party suffering damage may invoke the longest limitation period. Interruption of the limitation period must in all cases be done by instituting proceedings.

The amendments to the Competition Act only concern additions of terms due to the proposed Act on Actions for Damages on the basis of an infringement of competition law.

The acts are to enter into force on 26 December 2016.

The Government Proposal can be read here (only in Finnish and Swedish).

 

For more information, please contact:
Sari Hiltunen
Hannele Huimala
Salla Mäntykangas-Saarinen

Latest references

We successfully represented Trety AB in a dispute and settlement negotiations concerning an agreement for development and production of communication devices for the healthcare sector. Eventually, the parties reached an amicable settlement to the full satisfaction of our client and thus the parties avoided an extensive arbitral proceeding. Trety AB is a global company that provides its customers with solutions for development, industrialization and production of electronics. Trety AB has over 30 years’ experience from IT, electronics and telecommunication industries.
Case published 11.2.2025
We advised a financier consortium including OP Corporate Bank plc, Nordea Bank Abp, and Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB in a leveraged financing arrangement for Vexve, a company owned by DevCo Partners Oy. The financing included EUR 143 million acquisition, refinancing and other facilities for, among other things, the financing of Vexve’s acquisition of Denmark-based Frese A/S, a leading manufacturer of dynamic balancing valves for hydronic networks. Vexve’s combined turnover after the completion of the transaction will be ca. EUR 200 million. Vexve is the leading European provider of valve solutions for the energy sector and selected energy-intensive industries.
Case published 7.2.2025
Castrén & Snellman is acting as the legal advisor to the City of Pori and Pori Energia Oy in the finance arrangement whereby debt facilities in the total amount of EUR 292 million are secured for the purpose of refinancing the existing liabilities and fuelling the future growth of Pori Energia. Pori Energia and its financiers signed a Finnish law governed facilities agreement for this purpose on 13 January 2025. Pori Energia, a multi-utility company, operates in various sectors including district heating, electricity distribution, and electricity generation through CHP and renewable sources. The company also provides wind power services and industrial energy solutions in the Satakunta region where it has c. 60,000 customers.
Case published 6.2.2025
We advised Sanok Rubber Company S.A. in connection with a transaction where the Polish International Development Fund 2 FIZ AN acquired 30% of the shares in Teknikum Group Ltd from Sanok Rubber Company S.A. Teknikum Group is a European polymer technology company serving industrial customers in need of reliable rubber, plastic, silicone, polyurethane, and foam solutions. The group has approximately 600 employees and operates four production plants in Finland and one in Hungary, and a sales office in Germany. Sanok Rubber Company S.A. is the European leader in the field of rubber products, rubber-to-metal articles and combination of rubber with other materials for the automotive, construction, agriculture, pharmacy and household appliances. Sanok Rubber Company S.A. is listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange and employs more than 3,000 people in Europe and North America. Polish International Development Fund 2 FIZ AN is one of two specialised foreign expansion funds managed by PFR TFI. The fund’s aim is to co-finance foreign investments of Polish companies. We advised Sanok Rubber Company S.A. together with the Polish law firm Rymarz Zdort Maruta.
Case published 3.2.2025