13.2.2019

Preliminary Tax Discussions with the Finnish Tax Administration Reduce Uncertainty in Taxation

In a preliminary discussion, taxpayers can get face-to-face guidance on the tax treatment of their planned transactions at the Finnish Tax Administration. Before the preliminary discussions, the taxpayer must provide the Tax Administration experts with information on the planned transaction, which can also include the taxpayer’s own view of the tax treatment.

This submission seeks to ensure that the authorities have sufficient information to issue a decision on the matter either as soon as the discussions end or shortly thereafter. The written guidance provided by the Tax Administration in the discussion provides the taxpayer with the same protection of legitimate expectations as a preliminary ruling does. The taxpayer can also adjust its plans based on the guidance received in the discussions.

The Large Taxpayers’ Office has already been using preliminary discussions for some time. The Tax Administration decided to test their use with other corporate taxpayers in 2018 and has now extended the test to the tax year 2019. At best, this provides a faster route to obtaining a binding preliminary ruling than a normal written process, which at worst can last a year before a binding ruling—not to mention the possible appeal process.

Preliminary discussions are intended for challenging tax questions of corporate taxpayers. Though the system is still new, we have already assisted, for example, Danske Bank and Ilmarinen in confirming the tax treatment of the transactions concerned through preliminary discussions.

If you think your company could benefit from this new preliminary guidance channel or you would like more information on carrying out a preliminary discussion procedure in practice, we would be happy to help.


Please contact:
Mikko Alakare
Sari Laaksonen
Emmi Mäkäräinen

Latest references

We advised Nordea Bank Abp in the EUR 150 million new green financing for Lahti Energia Oy to support investments promoting a clean transition and to refinance existing loans. Lahti Energia Oy’s green loan investments focus on solutions that reduce fossil carbon dioxide emissions and support sustainable development. Planned projects include electric boilers, district heating storage facilities, and investments in the development of energy networks.
Case published 1.7.2025
We advised Netel Group, a Nasdaq Stockholm-listed contracting company, on the sale of its Finnish operations, Netel Oy, to a group of private investors. The divestment forms part of Netel Group’s strategic realignment. In January 2025, Netel Group announced its decision to exit the Finnish market in order to concentrate on its core markets in Sweden and Norway and growth markets in Germany and the UK. Netel Group is a leading provider of services in the development and maintenance of critical infrastructure within Infraservices, Power and Telecom across Northern Europe. The company has been listed on Nasdaq Stockholm since 2021.
Case published 1.7.2025
We advised Glaston Corporation on its reverse share split, i.e. in the reduction of its total outstanding shares so that each two shares of the company were merged into one share. The shares of Glaston have been listed into the Helsinki Stock Exchange. Glaston is the glass processing industry’s innovative technology leader supplying equipment, services and solutions to the architectural, mobility, display and solar industries. The company also supports the development of new technologies integrating intelligence to glass.
Case published 27.6.2025
We advised OP-Public Services Real Estate Fund in the sale of a portfolio of six care properties to Aedifica group, a Belgian real estate company specialised in European healthcare real estate, particularly in elderly care. The care properties in this portfolio are located across Finland in Helsinki, Tampere, Kuopio, Tuusula and Kirkkonummi. The portfolio has a total capacity for 233 residents. Aedifica group acquired 100% of the shares of the six real estate companies that own the properties. The total value of the transaction is approximately EUR 37.5 million.
Case published 26.6.2025