Petteri Günther has joined Castrén & Snellman’s Intellectual Property and Data & Technology practices as counsel on 15 August. Petteri has a profound understanding of intellectual property, media law, the regulation of new technologies, and vast experience in digitalisation-related projects. Copyright law and copyright-related issues in a range of industries are part of this core expertise.
15.8.2022
Intellectual Property and Technology Expert Petteri Günther Joins Castrén & Snellman
Related services
Prior to joining Castrén & Snellman, Petteri worked as senior legal counsel at Elisa. Before his position at Elisa, Petteri practiced law in the private sector for over 10 years.
Petteri has also been active in academia: he has completed master’s degrees in law at both the University of Helsinki and Stockholm University, and also holds a master’s degree and a doctorate in economics from Hanken School of Economics in Helsinki. Petteri’s PhD thesis was on digital content distribution and copyright in the information society. He has also been a visiting researcher at the University of Oxford and visiting scholar at Stanford Law School as well as a guest researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law.
‘I am excited to go back into private practice. There will be many familiar faces at Castrén & Snellman, but I am also looking forward to meeting new colleagues and taking on interesting projects and clients’, Petteri says.
The Intellectual Property and Data & Technology teams are happy to welcome Petteri.
‘We will benefit from Petteri’s extensive expertise in intellectual property rights and technology. His versatile background in the private sector, business and academia make him an excellent counsel for our clients in matters relating to new technologies and business models – and a great colleague’, says Partner, Head of IP Sakari Salonen.
‘Petteri has a strong background as an IP and tech attorney and particular expertise in the regulation of technology and the legal aspects of digitalisation. We are glad to have a very versatile lawyer like Petteri on our team’, says Partner Kim Parviainen.
We must take a deeper look at developments in data and technology – new regulation is not always required
Having worked in the audio-visual, music and game industries, Petteri has had a clear view into how copyright and regulation issues have changed in recent years.
‘Copyright was first introduced to protect original literary or artistic works, but today copyright is at the core of many fields such as software development. At the same time for instance the entertainment industry has increasingly become service-based: it is no longer about distributing copies of individual works but giving access to those, of which streaming services are a good example. Similar development is happening in other fields as well, such as the automotive industry.’
Changes in the markets have given rise to increasing regulatory changes. The European Union in particular has introduced a lot of new regulation. Petteri is critical of new regulation without clearly defined objectives and thorough impact assessments: before enacting new legislation there should be a clearer idea of what societal problem the legislation would address and how it would solve that problem, including how the legislation would impact markets in practice.
Petteri also stresses that new phenomena may not always require new regulation.
‘New phenomena often have their roots in concepts that are already established in the market, and the existing regulation may be fit for tackling new challenges. That is why it is important to look past the surface level when it comes to new phenomena.’
Castrén & Snellman’s Intellectual Property team is one of Finland’s leading and most experienced IP practices. Our versatile team of lawyers and experts covers every area of IP, from protection to commercialisation and enforcement. Our expertise and the solutions we provide have repeatedly been acknowledged in the top tier by international directories such as Chambers Europe and Global, Legal500, Managing IP, World Trademark Review and IAM Patent 1000.
Latest news
Latest references
A. Ahlström – ESG advisory and corporate sustainability due diligence process planning
We advised A. Ahlström in establishing a corporate sustainability due diligence process plan which incorporates best practices and tailored solutions based on our expertise within relevant business sectors. Our comprehensive ESG offering also included tailored training for members of the investment team and management team and the board of directors of several portfolio companies. ‘The ESG team at Castrén & Snellman provided us with legal and practical advice around the ESG regulatory tsunami that we need to incorporate in our ESG work,’ comments Camilla Sågbom. A. Ahlström is a family-owned industrial company, developing leading global specialist positions in Forest & Fiber and Environmental technology sectors.
Case published 5.9.2024
Vapaus Bikes Finland – Series A funding round
We represented Vapaus Bikes Finland Oy, a company offering employee benefit bikes, in its international EUR 10 million Series A funding round. The investors behind the funding are private equity investors Shift4Good and Superhero Capital Ltd as well as Tesi together with the European Guarantee Fund of the European Investment Bank. The equity-based funding will support the company’s international expansion, software development, platform automation, and the growth of its concept for the second-hand market of bikes. Vapaus Bikes Finland is at the forefront of sustainable mobility services and has been a pioneer in the Employee Benefit Bikes sector since late 2020. It has been ranked among Finland’s fastest growing companies. Shift4Good is an impact venture capital fund focused on the decarbonisation of the transportation sector. Tesi (officially Finnish Industry Investment Ltd) is a state-owned, market-driven investment company that invests in venture capital and private equity funds and directly in Finnish startups and growth companies.
Case published 21.8.2024
City of Rovaniemi – Former employees ordered to pay damages in an investment decision matter
We successfully acted for the City of Rovaniemi in a matter concerning offence in public office and damages claims in relation to a significant investment decision made by the city. The defendants were the city’s former municipal corporate officer, who was in an employment relationship, and a city treasurer, who was in a public-service employment relationship and acted as the supervisor of the municipal corporate officer. The criminal matter related to the City Board’s decision to invest EUR 2 million of the city’s funds in bonds offered by a newly established investment company in accordance with a decision prepared by the defendants. A significant part of the company’s operations involved quick loan business. The main legal question in the matter was whether the investment of public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and whether regulation on offences in public office therefore becomes applicable even to a person in an employment relationship. The municipal corporate officer in an employment relationship was charged with aggravated abuse of public office based on her negligence in the preparation and presentation of the investment decision as well as based on a conflict of interest due to the fact that she had invested her own money in a company that received funding from the investment target presented to the City Board. The charges of an offence in public office against the city treasurer concerned his position as the supervisor and reporter of the city’s investment activities. He was also involved in the preparation and presentation of the City Board’s decision. The processing of the matter started in the District Court of Lapland in June 2022. In its judgment given in August 2022, the District Court stated, based among other things on our argumentation, that the investment of public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and that regulation on offences in public office can therefore be applied to the municipal corporate officer. The District Court deemed that the conduct of the former municipal corporate officer fulfils the characteristics of abuse of public office and that the conduct of the former city treasurer fulfils the characteristics of violation of official duty with respect to the preparation of the investment decision, but the right to bring charges had become time-barred. Punishments could therefore not be imposed on the defendants, but the defendants were ordered to jointly and severally pay the city approximately EUR 114,000 in damages plus interest for late payment. The city treasurer’s share of the amount was 10%. The prosecutor accepted the judgment but the other parties appealed it to the Court of Appeal. Acting for the city, we pursued claims for both punishment and damages in the Court of Appeal. The Rovaniemi Court of Appeal processed the matter in November and December 2023. In its judgment given in June 2024, the Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s judgment with respect to the abuse of public office and violation of official duty. The Court of Appeal deemed that the municipal corporate officer had failed in her duty to declare the conflict of interest. In addition, she had failed in her duty to ensure that the prepared decision was in compliance with the city’s investment guidelines and that it had been properly put out to tender. The Court of Appeal also found that the text of the investment proposal was insufficient and misleading and that the municipal corporate officer’s conduct was intentional. As regards the city treasurer, the Court of Appeal held that he had failed in his duty to ensure that the investment proposal to the City Board complied with the investment guidelines, that the presentation was not misleading and that risks were taken into account as required by the investment guidelines. With the judgement, the Court of Appeal took a clear position that abuse in public offices and when exercising public authority is not acceptable. The judgment is also significant as it declares that investing public funds constitutes an exercise of public authority and that the liability for acts in office therefore becomes applicable even to persons in employment relationships. In addition, a key question for the Court of Appeal to assess was defining the amount of economic damage in a matter related to investment activities. The Court of Appeal held based on our arguments that the conduct of the municipal corporate officer and the city treasurer had caused damage to the city. The Court of Appeal increased the amount of damages to EUR 210,000 with the city treasurer’s share limited to 10%. The amount was increased because the Court of Appeal deemed that the city had suffered damage not only in terms of the loss of capital but also in terms of the loss of estimated return on investment. The judgement is not final.
Case published 21.8.2024
Tesi – Investment in Sisu Auto
We advised Tesi (Finnish Industry Investment Ltd) in its investment in the heavy duty vehicles company Oy Sisu Auto Ab. With this investment, Tesi became an owner in the company with a share of 24.4 per cent. Sisu Auto is a pioneer in the Nordic market in the development of heavy duty vehicles. Sisu’s core competences are in the product development and production of trucks and military vehicles. Tesi is a state-owned, market-driven investment company that invests in venture capital and private equity funds and directly in Finnish startups and growth companies. The investments managed by Tesi total 2.1 billion euros.
Case published 19.8.2024