Miika Junttila, Tuomas Honkinen and Jussi Mäkikangas contributed a chapter to the Chambers Technology M&A 2023 Global Practice Guide covering the law and practice of the technology M&A market and the recent developments in Finland.
6.3.2023
Castrén & Snellman contributed a chapter on Finland to the Chambers Technology M&A 2023 Global Practice Guide
Jussi Mäkikangas & Tuomas Honkinen
Related services
At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a steep decline in M&A activity and also some decline in investments in general (especially in 2020). However, the pace quickly picked up in 2021 and reached record-breaking levels with Nasdaq Helsinki breaking the record for IPOs, with a total of nine listings in the main market and 23 listings in the First North Growth Market.
Given the market uncertainty due to the Ukraine situation and increase in interest rates, M&A activity again showed signs of minor deacceleration in 2022 (especially in the second quarter). Although IPO activity significantly dropped during 2022, trade sale transactions raised their profile as an exit route for investors. The lower deal volume was to some extent also offset by the high number of divestments and reorganisations that many large and medium-sized Finnish companies had to undertake in order to comply with the sanctions imposed against Russia.
New technologies attracting interest
The past two years have seen major interest and investments in new technologies and markets such as AI, robotics, and blockchain technology. These include:
Read more about the technology M&A market in Finland
The second edition of the Chambers Technology M&A 2023 Global Practice Guide covers the lifespan of a technology company from incorporation to early funding and venture capital rounds and to the ultimate goal of becoming a public company or being sold at a high premium.
The coverage of the guide has been expanded this year, and it now addresses the same set of issues in 19 countries globally.
The guide can be downloaded here.
Latest news
Latest references
Suomen Aurinkovoima – Financing arrangement to build solar parks
Castrén & Snellman acted as legal advisor to Suomen Aurinkovoima Oy and its owners in a financing tender process and a financing arrangement implemented with Danske Bank to secure financing for the company’s future solar park projects. Suomen Aurinkovoima, established by Oulun Seudun Sähkö, Oulun Energia, Vantaan Energia and Savon Voima, is a company focused on increasing domestic solar power. The company manages solar park projects from planning to implementation and maintenance, and its goal is to build dozens of new solar parks across Finland by 2030.
Case published 22.10.2025
DNB Bank ASA – Lease and development of premises
We advised DNB Bank ASA in its agreement with Fennia Mutual Insurance Company on the development and lease of the premises at Fabianinkatu 8, Helsinki. With the lease agreement, DNB Bank ASA will focus all its Finnish operations at the Fabian 8 office. The other tenants at the renewed premises will be DNB Carnegie Investment Bank AB’s Finnish operations and DNB Auto Finance Oy. In connection with the long-term lease agreement, the parties also agreed on a major renovation project to completely refurbish the premises. The object of lease will be completed in the second half of 2027.
Case published 10.10.2025
Yellow Film Studios – Merger of Yellow Film Studios and REinvent Studios
We advised Yellow Film Studios, the largest independent film and television production company in the Nordics, in its strategic merger with Danish film industry sales and financing studio REinvent Studios. Together they form Reinvent Yellow, a unified hub for television and film production, sales, financing and innovation, combining over three decades of production experience and a vast catalogue of titles.
Case published 8.10.2025
International reinsurance companies – Ad hoc arbitration proceedings
We successfully represented a panel of reinsurance companies in an international ad hoc arbitration. The dispute arose out of a reinsurance treaty under the terms of which the reinsurers had reinsured a portfolio of risks underwritten by the cedent. The parties disagreed as to whether the reinsurance provided coverage for a certain loss that had occurred because of the market turmoil caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The case involved highly complex legal and contractual questions requiring special expertise on reinsurance law and practice. The arbitral tribunal rejected the counterparty’s claims for reinsurance compensation against our clients in full. The amount in dispute was approximately EUR 34 million.
Case published 16.9.2025