8.10.2015

Legal Transplants: What Do Endeavours Clauses Mean in Finland?

You have no doubt come across endeavours clauses in contracts, but have you ever stopped to think what this kind of a clause actually means? For example, can ‘best efforts’ require that you act against your own commercial interests in order to stick to the deal you’ve made? And what about when a contract is written in English but governed by Finnish law?

What is a Legal Transplant?

Although international contracts are quite standardly written in English, the law applicable to the contract may often be that of another jurisdiction. In these kinds of contracts, certain phrases and concepts that are commonly used in English are interpreted under the applicable law without necessarily taking into account any established meanings assigned to them under the law of the language they are written in. These kinds of clauses are called legal transplants.

Finnish Endeavours

Endeavours clauses are a good example of legal transplants under Finnish law. These clauses generally impose a requirement for a party to use ‘(all) reasonable’ or ‘best’ endeavours or efforts – or some variable of these – to reach an agreed outcome.

In common law jurisdictions, for example, there has been discussion regarding whether ‘all reasonable endeavours’ differ from ‘best endeavours’ and further the extent to which these are more onerous than just ‘reasonable endeavours’.

As English is not an official language in Finland, and Finland is not a common law jurisdiction, there is no established independent meaning for best efforts wordings under Finnish law. There is also no exact equivalent in Finnish legal practice for this concept.

Under Finnish law, best efforts phrases would therefore generally be given their natural meaning. ‘Reasonable efforts’ would require a party to take such measures to achieve the agreed outcome that would be considered reasonable under the circumstances. ‘All reasonable endeavours’ could in turn mean taking all of these measures.

What Are Best Efforts Anyway?

The concept of ‘best efforts’ under Finnish law is trickier, though. In spoken language it sounds like a legendary Finnish sports cliché – yritän parhaani ja katsotaan mihin se riittää (I’ll try my best and see how far that gets me), which is a notoriously meaningless phrase that could easily become a get out of jail free card. Whether the phrase is meaningless if explicitly stipulated in a written agreement can, of course, be another matter entirely.

Indeed, a particular issue of debate in common-law countries has been whether the requirement to use best efforts may in some circumstances require a party to act against its own commercial interests for the benefit of the other party in order to comply with a contract. This is, of course, also a very interesting question when it comes to legal transplants.

Under common law, the issue of commercial interest can be addressed, for example, by drafting the best efforts clause to state that a party shall use its best or (all) reasonable but commercially prudent efforts to reach an agreed outcome. Whilst it is not clear whether this addition is, indeed, absolutely necessary, it clarifies the meaning by eliminating the obscurity in the first place.

Do We Need Endeavours Clauses in Finland?

On the other hand, a valid point to remember is that the principle of good faith under Finnish law requires one to reasonably act in the other party’s interests regardless. This is a notable difference from English law, and, albeit not being a completely overlapping but rather a supplementing principle, one which arguably can make endeavours clauses less meaningful in contracts governed by Finnish law.

Another good point to remember is that the principle of good faith under Finnish law does not generally require a party to go against its own commercial interests for the benefit of another party. Combined with the fact that good faith principles apply to Finnish contracts by default, it might – depending on the context of course – sometimes be better to refrain from confusing general principles altogether and stick to conventional obligations instead. You either undertake something or you don’t – the simpler the better!

For common law discussion, see e.g. the following online articles by Simmons & Simmons (registration required):

Are reasonable endeavours best?

“Best endeavours” and “all reasonable endeavours”

Reasonable v best endeavours: how hard do you really have to try?

Latest references

We are acting as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum is selling its recycling and waste business. The business is sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million. The transaction is subject to authority approval and customary closing conditions. Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024
We advised WasaGroup Ltd in a green transition project where WasaGroup will plan Hitachi Energy’s new production and technology campus in Mustasaari. WasaGroup will be responsible for planning, permitting, managing and conducting the entire project as well as for the tender processes. We advised WasaGroup in drafting and commenting the project management and financing agreements for the project. The Mustasaari campus will be approximately 30,000 square meters in size. The investment by Hitachi Energy will double the capacity for transformer production in Finland, and the product range will expand to include even larger transformers. The objective of the investment is to meet the demand for transformers and other modern technology that is increasing in Finland and internationally due to the green energy transition. The first phase of the project involved an agreement for a development project to prepare the building permit and reach sufficient planning readiness for the implementation of the project. The aim is to have the production and technology campus in use by 2027.
Case published 30.5.2024
We successfully represented a major Finnish construction company in a dispute and settlement negotiations concerning a large construction project. The dispute mainly concerned liabilities for additional and change works as well as project delays, and the value of the claims of the parties was approximately EUR 50 million.  If the case had not been settled, it would have been one of the largest construction disputes ever tried in the Finnish courts. The projected number of hearing days was unprecedentedly more than 300 days. To find an amicable solution to the extensive dispute, the parties engaged in settlement negotiations and court mediation. Eventually, the parties reached an amicable settlement to the full satisfaction of our client and thus the parties avoided the costs and risks of an extensive trial.
Case published 7.2.2024
Valio is a food company with the courage to change with the times. Valio’s road to growth and towards the innovative transformation of the food industry is supported by its long-standing business law partner, Castrén & Snellman. Juha Hölttä became Valio’s General Counsel at a time when the company kicked its new strategy into a higher gear. ‘In the past two years we have made several significant market initiatives and expanded our business from food production to other areas of the value chain. By acquiring Heinon Tukku, we now provide a new kind of added value to restaurants and professional kitchens through our Valio Aimo ® wholesale business. And our joint venture with St1, Suomen Lantakaasu Oy, will enable us to reach our goal of turning manure into biogas for heavy transportation,’ Hölttä describes some of the milestones of the new strategy. In addition to expanding into new business areas, Valio continues to build a more sustainable dairy business alongside seeking international growth from plant-based products. Valio has invested in the international growth of its Oddlygood ® brand through incorporation and gained additional product development expertise through the acquisition of Gold&Green. Carbon footprint of milk reduced by new business operations Dairy products are at the core of Valio’s business, and the company develops this strong foundation not only through product innovation but also at the beginning of the food chain. ‘Who could have foreseen that dairy farm manure could become one way of tackling climate challenges? Our planned biogas plants will use manure and agricultural by-products to produce renewable liquefied biogas for use as transportation fuel,’ says Hölttä. ‘Valio is aiming for a carbon-neutral milk chain by 2035. We are making major reforms in our operations in order to make this happen.’ The sustainability programme for Valio’s 3,700 dairy farms has been expanded, and it now includes the preventive and systematic healthcare of cows as well as actions related to grazing, the climate and biodiversity. ‘Appreciation for locally produced food is on the rise, which means that sustainability questions are local as well. This is a good trend, as it makes it easier for us to make a difference.’ ‘Strategic help even in difficult circumstances’ The service-mindedness of lawyers is key in implementing a growth strategy. Castrén & Snellman Attorneys is a long-standing partner of Valio, and the relationship between the two is tight. ‘At Valio, we are always exploring new business opportunities, and us lawyers are tasked with assessing these opportunities. My philosophy as the General Counsel is that my door is always open. Together we can evaluate how to solve and implement new initiatives. In this job, you must be curious, broad-minded and business-oriented,’ summarises Hölttä. Hölttä’s legal team of five people is supported by experts from Castrén & Snellman. The key to successful partnership is that both parties are familiar with each other’s business operations and ways of working. ‘Castrén & Snellman knows us well, and they maintain an up-to-date overview of our situation, which I highly appreciate. It means that we are able to tackle tricky situations together quickly even in difficult circumstances.’ A joint fast reaction was needed, for example, when Valio exited the Russian market after the country launched its war of aggression on Ukraine. ‘The responsible thing was to leave quickly but in a controlled manner and by repatriating our investment as opposed to leaving an operational food production facility in the hands of a country that was waging war.’ A shared vision of sustainability Valio – Together we make life better A Finnish food company Approx. 4,600 employees Owned by 13 Finnish dairy cooperatives Finland’s most sustainable brand in the Sustainable Brand Index study Read more about sustainability at Valio Castrén & Snellman – Building sustainable success stories Forerunner of demanding legal services 300 employees Owned by its partners ‘We help our clients build sustainable success stories and achieve their sustainability goals.’ Read more about sustainability at Castrén & Snellman Shared success stories of Valio and C&S Global Brand Portfolio Management and IP Enforcement Purchase of Gold&Green’s Brand, IPR and R&D Function Joint Venture for Biogas Production with St1 Sale of Russian Operations Acquisition of Heinon Tukku Significant Growth Funding Round Competition Damages Case Defending Against Environmental Permit Challenge at the Appellate Level
Case published 4.5.2023