27.6.2018

International Dispute Resolution on the Rise in Finland

Finland is well on track to becoming a major hub of international business dispute resolution. This growth is being fed by Finland’s reputation for neutrality and efficiency. The Asian market also offers new potential.

According to the statistics of the Finland Chamber of Commerce, the number of international arbitration proceedings has increased in Finland in 2016–2017 by more than one-third compared to the two preceding years.

Castrén & Snellman’s Managing Partner Sakari Lukinmaa estimates that there is still potential for growth in the export market for dispute resolutions. Currently, half of Castrén & Snellman’s turnover comes from international assignments.

‘Finland’s good image also contributes to the growth of the dispute market. In arbitration proceedings, the parties to the dispute can freely choose the venue for and the legislation applied to the proceedings. When parties negotiate where a dispute should be resolved, Finland and the Finnish Arbitration Act are currently strong contenders’, says Lukinmaa.

This good position is a result of the Finnish court system being arbitration friendly. The attractiveness of Finnish law as an export is increased by our well-functioning legislative framework. Our educational level is high and we have skilled arbitrators and counsel for international disputes.

‘The Finnish dispute resolution method has earned a good reputation in the world. Our way of resolving matters is unassuming, efficient and solution-oriented’, says Partner Anders Forss who is specialised in dispute resolutions.

The Cold War Elevated Sweden, Asia Could Now Elevate Finland

During the Cold War, Sweden became a popular venue for arbitration proceedings. Sweden was considered a neutral country between the Soviet Union and the USA.

Finland may be the new bridge in today’s global political climate, as it occupies a strong position between the East and the West and the Asian economy is growing. Our assets are stability, safety and a lack of corruption.

However, Finland’s position could be even better if the Finnish Arbitration Act was reformed to correspond to the UN Model Law. In addition, Lukinmaa is of the opinion that active cooperation between different actors is what we now need.

‘A concerted push by the Finnish business life and attorneys could solidify Finland’s position as a dispute resolution country’, says Lukinmaa.

Latest references

Castrén & Snellman acted as legal advisor to Suomen Aurinkovoima Oy and its owners in a financing tender process and a financing arrangement implemented with Danske Bank to secure financing for the company’s future solar park projects. Suomen Aurinkovoima, established by Oulun Seudun Sähkö, Oulun Energia, Vantaan Energia and Savon Voima, is a company focused on increasing domestic solar power. The company manages solar park projects from planning to implementation and maintenance, and its goal is to build dozens of new solar parks across Finland by 2030.
Case published 22.10.2025
We advised DNB Bank ASA in its agreement with Fennia Mutual Insurance Company on the development and lease of the premises at Fabianinkatu 8, Helsinki. With the lease agreement, DNB Bank ASA will focus all its Finnish operations at the Fabian 8 office. The other tenants at the renewed premises will be DNB Carnegie Investment Bank AB’s Finnish operations and DNB Auto Finance Oy. In connection with the long-term lease agreement, the parties also agreed on a major renovation project to completely refurbish the premises. The object of lease will be completed in the second half of 2027.
Case published 10.10.2025
We advised Yellow Film Studios, the largest independent film and television production company in the Nordics, in its strategic merger with Danish film industry sales and financing studio REinvent Studios. Together they form Reinvent Yellow, a unified hub for television and film production, sales, financing and innovation, combining over three decades of production experience and a vast catalogue of titles.
Case published 8.10.2025
We successfully represented a panel of reinsurance companies in an international ad hoc arbitration. The dispute arose out of a reinsurance treaty under the terms of which the reinsurers had reinsured a portfolio of risks underwritten by the cedent. The parties disagreed as to whether the reinsurance provided coverage for a certain loss that had occurred because of the market turmoil caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The case involved highly complex legal and contractual questions requiring special expertise on reinsurance law and practice. The arbitral tribunal rejected the counterparty’s claims for reinsurance compensation against our clients in full. The amount in dispute was approximately EUR 34 million.
Case published 16.9.2025