Castrén & Snellman has a wide network of international partner firms. Markus Rahnu is gaining expertise in cross-border deals and regulation matters affecting them in New York as a visiting lawyer at Covington & Burling.
1.8.2024
Cross-border deals overseas: M&A expert Markus Rahnu gains valuable insight in New York
Markus Rahnu joins the remote meeting from Covington & Burling’s office in New York City. He is in the home stretch of the secondment that started last November. Covington & Burling is an international law firm with over 1,300 lawyers worldwide. It is a full-service firm that offers all business law services but is known for its M&A and regulatory expertise in particular.
Markus mainly works in the firm’s Nordic desk team, which specialises in the assignments of Nordic clients and participates in other international assignments actively as well. The Nordic desk’s clients include private equity investors and companies from various industries. Markus’ position is part of a Visiting Lawyer programme, which involves a wide range of lawyers from different countries.
The secondment worked out due to Castrén & Snellman’s extensive international networks. Markus had been interested in gaining international experience, and at the same time Castrén & Snellman had been having initial discussions with its long-term business partner Covington & Burling about having one of our firm’s lawyers take part in their Visiting Lawyer programme.
International M&A transactions in a regulated market
Markus has mainly been working on international M&A transactions for Nordic clients that are actively operating in or are expanding their operations to the United States.
‘M&A transactions in Finland and the US have many similar elements. Same tools, principles and documentation can be used in various situations,’ says Markus.
Even though many aspects of the deals are alike, Markus thinks that the most essential difference is in regulation. ‘In Finland and in the EU, regulation issues often relate to competition law, industry-specific regulation and the monitoring of foreign direct investments, i.e. FDI regulation. The regulation of M&A transactions is more complex in the US, and the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) reviews many foreign investments and other transactions before they can be completed. I have had the opportunity to delve into the local regulation and its impacts during my secondment.’
Right now the regulation is also affected by the geopolitical situation in the US as well as the aim to protect the domestic market in a certain way.
‘China’s influence in the international market is currently heavily reflected in the US regulation. In some critical sectors in particular, M&A transactions and investments conducted by certain sensitive parties are monitored and may be restricted. This has widespread impacts that need to be taken into account in the ownership and supply chains of companies in Europe as well. On top of that, efforts are being made to limit companies’ operations, for example by imposing significantly higher taxes on goods imported from China,’ Markus explains.
Signs of recovery in the market
During his stay in New York, Markus has also seen up close the development of the US market and the latest changes in it.
‘The interest rates are still at a high level in the US, as in Europe. In addition, geopolitical tensions and the upcoming presidential elections slow down the increase in M&A transaction activity. The number of deals is still low but valuation levels are high, particularly in certain sectors. Medium-sized industrial companies have made strategic acquisitions as well as divestments,’ Markus describes the market.
Despite the challenging times, some industries have seen successful deals. ‘M&A transactions have been carried out by technology companies and AI operators as well as many actors in the pharmaceutical and life science industries. The transactions of AI companies in particular are interesting, as they also impact companies that use AI and aim to build competitive advantage with it.’
Markus finds that the market is already showing tentative signs of recovery since there seems to be increasing activity in securities transactions and IPOs in addition to M&A transactions. He expects that the recovery in the US market will soon be reflected in Europe. ‘Buyers and sellers are finding a consensus on valuation levels and other key aspects, and this is currently reflected in the terms of sale and purchase agreements, although processes and negotiations are still taking a little longer than usual. Compromises are being made on both sides in order to bring the deal to a successful conclusion. We have already seen similar trends in Europe, which will likely increase as interest rates fall,’ he concludes.
The secondment builds skills and international networks
Markus describes the secondment period as an educational experience that builds up both his M&A expertise and his professional networks. He has had the opportunity to meet lawyers from all over the world, and the complex cross-border deals have broadened his knowledge of evolving transaction documentation and the US market.
‘Market changes in the US are usually reflected in Europe and the same applies to many trends in transaction documentation. Certain terms and special features that are now used here in sale and purchase agreements will soon be adopted in Finland,’ Markus says.
When Markus returns to Finland and Castrén & Snellman in September, he will bring a wealth of new skills with him. ‘Our team will be able to draw on the fresh lessons and best practices from my secondment in the intensive M&A market and will be even better prepared to assist our clients in all types of transactions.’
Latest news
Latest references
Fortum – AI workshop
We delivered two AI workshops for Fortum Corporation’s Mergers and Acquisitions team, with both legal and business professionals participating. The sessions combined fundamental AI principles with custom use cases for commercially available AI tools tailored to Fortum’s needs. We also presented a bespoke solution merging AI with a script-based tool developed by our Legal Tech team, enabling a more automated way of working. Our experts conducted the training drawing on their legal background and leading experience in this emerging field of legal technology. Participants particularly appreciated the clarity and relevance of the implementations demonstrated. ‘C&S delivered an excellent, well-structured series of workshops, with directly applicable takeaways,’ says Sabina Hautaviita, Legal Counsel for M&A at Fortum.
Case published 9.3.2026
VR – Supreme Court decision clarifies working time practices
We successfully represented VR Group before the Supreme Court in a case concerning the meal break practice of commuter train drivers. On 6 February 2026, the Supreme Court ruled in VR’s favour (decision KKO:2026:12), confirming that VR had the right to amend the commuter train drivers’ meal break practice in 2021 by rendering the break unpaid in accordance with the applicable collective agreement. This decision clarifies the interpretation of collective agreements and employment legislation as well as the limits of the employer’s right to direct work. Over 250 commuter train drivers challenged the unpaid meal break practice which VR introduced in April 2021. Before the change, meal breaks had a long history of being paid. The change was based on the train drivers’ collective agreement, which allows for meal breaks to be organised either as paid or unpaid time. The Supreme Court ruled that the scheduling and managing of breaks falls within the core area of the employer’s right to direct work. This increases the threshold for an established practice becoming a binding condition for the parties. Merely following a practice consistently and over a long period of time does not make the practice binding; instead, the employer’s intent to commit to the practice must be clearly evident from the employer’s conduct or other circumstances. As both alternatives – paid and unpaid – for organising meal breaks had been retained in the collective agreement despite other amendments over the years, it could not be considered that VR had intended to commit to the paid break practice and waive its right to direct work as regards break scheduling. It was also significant that the employment contracts explicitly referred only to the collective agreement as regards working time. The Supreme Court deemed that the employees’ paid meal break was not an established term of employment and that VR was entitled to change the practice based on the collective agreement. The employer had the right, by virtue of its right to direct work, to unilaterally change the meal break practice by choosing to apply the other arrangement permitted by the collective agreement.
Case published 3.3.2026
CapMan Growth – Investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku
We are assisting CapMan Growth in its significant investment in Kuntokeskus Liikku, a Finnish gym chain known for its high-quality self-service facilities and excellent value for money. The investment will further strengthen Liikku’s position as a market leader and support the continued execution of its growth strategy. Liikku is one of Finland’s leading fitness chains, with more than 70 locations across the country serving nearly 90,000 members. The company’s concept is to offer high-quality self-service gyms at an exceptionally competitive price point which, combined with strong operational efficiency, provides a solid foundation for profitable growth. The company’s main shareholder is COR Group, a long-time partner of CapMan Growth, and a Finnish health and wellness conglomerate known for active ownership and long-term value creation. CapMan Growth is a leading Finnish growth investor that makes significant investments in entrepreneur-led growth companies with a turnover of €10–200 million. CapMan Growth is part of CapMan, which is a leading Nordic private equity investor engaged in active value creation work. CapMan has been listed on the Helsinki Stock Exchange since 2001.
Case published 27.2.2026
Terrafame – Environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area
Castrén & Snellman successfully assisted Terrafame Ltd in environmental and water management permit processes concerning the company’s entire operations and the KL1 side rock area, on which the Supreme Administrative Court issued its decision on 12 February 2026 (KHO 366/2026 and 367/2026). The changes made to the decisions of the Vaasa Administrative Court as a result of Terrafame’s appeals, enable the company to implement its new strategy and develop its operations as planned. The decisions of the Supreme Administrative Court brought the nearly ten-year-long permit process to a close.
Case published 20.2.2026