4.5.2015

Amendments to Insurance Companies Act–Implementation of Solvency II in Finland

At the very end of its term, the previous Parliament adopted amendments to the Insurance Companies Act and certain related acts (Statutes of Finland 303–314/2015 and government proposal HE 344/2014 vp). These amendments implement the Directive on the Taking-up and Pursuit of the Business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC)).

The aim of the Directive is to harmonise the regulation of non-life insurance, life insurance and reinsurance undertakings at the Community level and to increase transparency and stability in the insurance sector.

The amendments will enter into force in accordance with an implementation law mostly on 1 January 2016. The Solvency II Directive was already partly implemented in Finland last year with a Finnish ‘Solvency 1.5’ package, which concerned, in particular, insurance company management systems.

New Definitions for Small Insurance Undertakings

New definitions are now being introduced in the Insurance Companies Act relating to, e.g. small insurance undertakings. The definition of a small insurance undertaking corresponds to the definition of undertakings excluded from the scope of Solvency II due to their size.

A small insurance undertaking means an undertaking that fulfils the following conditions:

The point of departure that has been adopted in Finland is that, as a rule, all provisions of the Insurance Companies Act apply to small insurance undertakings in order to secure the interests of the insured persons, although the Solvency II Directive would even allow small insurance undertakings to operate without a licence.

However, the right of small insurance undertakings not to observe the detailed Commission Regulation complementary to the Solvency II Directive and the technical standards was introduced in the Act to the extent that the provisions of the Regulation regard the provisions on the governance system or the disclosure of information laid down in the Insurance Companies Act. Special rules on the equalisation provision for small insurance undertakings were also introduced.

New Solvency Rules

The prudential requirements of the Insurance Companies Act currently in force will be replaced by new rules compliant with the Solvency II Directive. Two capital requirements are laid down for insurance undertakings: the prudential capital requirement and the minimum capital requirement. In the calculation of capital requirements, all substantial risks to the insurance undertaking are taken into account, the observation period being 12 months. An insurance company shall fulfil the capital requirements laid down in the new legislation with its own assets of a sufficient quality.

It is considered that falling short of the minimum capital requirement calculated in accordance with the legislation would seriously compromise insured interests. As a result, an insurance company failing to fulfil this requirement will be obligated to draw up a recovery plan and financing scheme. It will also be subject to coercive measures by authorities, such as a restraint on alienation and a negative pledge ordered by the Financial Supervisory Authority.

Changes to Equalisation Provision

The equalisation provision rules for insurance companies will change considerably. The equalisation provision has been used in Finland to prepare for years with a high damage rate and to even out variation between years. It has constituted a significant part of the capital adequacy of non-life insurance companies. The equalisation provision will be maintained in the new legislation, but it has been amended to correspond to the requirements laid down in the Solvency II Directive.

The equalisation provision will no longer apply to life assurance companies. As regards non-life insurance companies, a target amount for the equalisation provision will be set in proportion to the risks of the insurance business. There will also be a maximum amount for the equalisation provision, equal to four times the target amount. The current equalisation provision of a life assurance company and the amount exceeding the maximum amount of the equalisation provision of a non-life insurance company must be dissolved in accordance with a plan to be drawn up separately by 2026.

Changes to Supervision of Insurance Companies

The provisions concerning the supervision of insurance companies were also amended. For instance, the new legislation clarifies the general principles on which the Financial Supervisory Authority focuses while carrying out its supervisory activities. In terms of principle, the most significant change concerns the possibility to lay down additional own funds, in other words to raise the prudential requirement of an insurance company. In accordance with the amended Act, the Financial Supervisory Authority may, in exceptional cases, confirm an increased prudential requirement for an insurance company. In addition, the provisions on the supervision of an insurance group pursuant to Solvency II have been introduced in the Act.

Public Disclosure of Solvency and Financial Position

Finally, another important amendment to the Insurance Companies Act will be the insertion of a new chapter on the public disclosure of information concerning insurance undertakings’ solvency and financial condition. In accordance with the revised law, insurance undertakings are required to disclose publicly, on an annual basis, a report on their solvency and financial condition. A public disclosure is also required in the event of any major development affecting the operation of the company.

Run-Off Companies Given Chance to Remain Outside Solvency II

An insurance company that has stopped granting new insurances and entered run-off by 1 January 2016 can observe the provisions of the previous law, provided that it has submitted a notification to the Financial Supervisory Authority, if the company administers its existing portfolio in order to terminate its activity by 31 December 2018 or is in liquidation and the liquidator has been nominated.

 

Read more about our Insurance service.

 

Latest references

We advised the shareholders of Suomen Autohuolto Oy in connection with the sale of the company’s entire share capital, to SAKA Finland Group Oy. Suomen Autohuolto Group is one of Finland’s largest companies specializing in brand-specific automotive maintenance and has locations in Oulu, Tampere, and from July, also in Järvenpää. The transaction is subject to final approval by the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority (KKV).
Case published 26.6.2026
AI training
We delivered two tailor-made AI workshops for the lawyers at the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke). We discussed the AI revolution and its impact on lawyers’ ways of thinking and working, and left the participants with practical solutions for enhancing and streamlining their work with Legora. Our AI-specialist lawyers prepared use cases tailored to Luke and the needs of public administration, which Luke received for its own use following the workshops. These use cases covered topics such as: utilising legal sources and the organisation’s own data to maximise AI results building and leveraging AI workflows AI-enhanced contract drafting based on a large volume of documents. The workshops sparked wide-ranging discussion on the role and benefits of AI in legal work. Participants appreciated how clearly and comprehensively our experts were able to present the nature and benefits of AI specifically within a legal context. ‘The workshops provided excellent support for Luke’s goal of leveraging AI responsibly and gave us concrete and ready-to-use practical takeaways,’ says Hannu Laitinen, Luke’s Senior Vice President, Administrative Affairs.
Case published 26.6.2026
We successfully represented a Finnish construction management consultancy and a safety coordinator employed by the company in criminal proceedings concerning an alleged occupational safety and health offence. The prosecutor sought a penalty for an alleged breach of occupational safety regulations. The charge arose from a fall accident at a construction site where our client acted as the safety coordinator appointed by the developer. We assessed the scope of the safety coordinator’s duties in relation to the responsibilities of the main contractor, as well as how our client had fulfilled their obligations in practice. We demonstrated that our client had acted with due care and in full compliance with their duties throughout the planning, preparation and execution of the construction project. The District Court of Eastern Uusimaa dismissed the charge against our client. The Court held that our client, in their capacity as safety coordinator, had duly fulfilled the occupational safety obligations incumbent on the developer during the planning and preparation phases of the construction project and had not been aware of the fall protection deficiency identified at the site. The judgment is final insofar as our client is concerned.
Case published 22.6.2026
We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its financial management services business to Rantalainen as part of its strategic focus on fully concentrating on the delivery of business applications as well as data and AI solutions. As a result of the transaction, customer contracts related to financial management services and 65 experts working in these services will transfer to Rantalainen. The transaction will be carried out as a transfer of business, and the experts will move to the new owner as existing employees. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere.
Case published 12.6.2026