18.1.2019

Industries in Transformation – How Lawyers Can Help the Reshaping of Business

As an attorney, I have the opportunity to work closely with clients from many different industries. It is interesting to see that companies from seemingly completely different fields of business are actually facing quite similar transformational forces. In order to successfully navigate the current turbulent business landscape, companies need to transform and reshape their strategies, businesses and operational models. I believe that lawyers – both in-house and in private practice – can play an important role in facilitating these changes.

Drivers of Transformation

The challenges currently reshaping the markets, for example, in the fields of energy and banking, include the transfer from product centricity to customer centricity, the need for faster reaction times, increasing complexity, as well as advances in technology and digitalisation. All of these phenomena are actually very familiar to us lawyers in our own daily legal work.

Every lawyer has clients – be they internal customers for in-house lawyers or the clients of us attorneys – whom we seek to serve to the best of our abilities. Lawyers tend to master quick reaction times and continuously encounter very complex situations. We have also learned to live with uncertainty, which is inevitable in legal interpretation questions.

As for digital solutions, here at Castrén & Snellman, for example, we have automated our document production practices and are experimenting AI solutions in our projects. Our document management systems have been digital for almost two decades already!

On the Pulse of Business

Lawyers have the opportunity to be trusted partners and advisors to our colleagues in business positions. This is especially true of in-house lawyers: be it the legal department of a large corporation or the only lawyer in a smaller company, in-house lawyers get to work and interact with all parts of the organisation, from the boardroom to front-line sales and services.

On the other hand, we external counsel get to act in many different industries and have a front row seat to see the ongoing industry convergence. In these interactions, we have a unique opportunity to contribute to and facilitate concrete actions. Ideally, in-house and outside lawyers get to pool their experience in close cooperation for the benefit of the business.

Lawyers as Integrators

According to several studies, professionals who regularly work with various different stakeholders within an organisation can have a strong positive impact by advising and connecting stakeholders to each other, which those stakeholders normally would not do. This is something that we lawyers should always keep in mind and do even more often. The same also applies to external networks: sometimes connecting persons from different firms may lead to new opportunities for all the parties involved.

Methodology

Dealing with legal matters often – and ideally – occurs before any problems actually arise. Therefore, a lawyer’s duty is to find out what the possible scenarios are that could occur in the future, and prepare the legal side of the business case accordingly. This could include formulating clauses in a contract to cover more or less anticipated scenarios or, for example, preparing a leak plan for an insider project of a listed company.

Due to the nature of legal work, lawyers often are able to ask the ‘painful’ questions. This is an essential part of a lawyer’s toolbox and should be used in a business-minded way.

Pioneering and Piloting

Lawyers can be creative, too. Perhaps not as creative as engineers or colleagues on the commercial side, but sometimes certain new practices or ways of working are adopted in corporate legal departments or law firms before other places. Legal teams are usually quite small compared to business side teams. This makes piloting and pioneering new practices quite easy for us lawyers. In the best case, piloted practices have the potential to be scaled up for the business lines, as well. Even in the worst case, the pilot may reach its end in the legal team based on critical feedback, which we lawyers are often quite eager to provide.

Shaping Future Business

Although the last couple of years have seen many good examples of in-house legal teams and external counsel contributing to the reshaping of businesses to meet evolving market demands, I believe that even more can and should be done. It is clear that the best results require cooperation between in-house and external lawyers. Based on my own empirical evidence, I can say that this can often be fun!

Latest references

We advised Efima Oyj on the sale of its AI business to Better Care Technologies Oy. The transaction included Efima’s Moiva AI platform developed for the care sector, the related technology and brand, customer contracts, and the experts working in the business. Efima is a Finnish digital company that supports the sustainable growth of large and mid-sized companies by streamlining their business processes and by creating competitive advantage through the innovative use of artificial intelligence and data. The company has nearly 200 experts based in Helsinki and Tampere. 
Case published 21.9.2026
We advised Neoen Renewables Finland Oy, part of the French Neoen Group, in its sale of a data centre project to a consortium consisting of international data centre developers and operators. This marked Neoen’s first data centre development project in Finland. Founded in 2008, Neoen is one of the world’s leading independent renewable energy producers. The company operates in 15 countries. It develops, finances, builds, owns, and operates solar power plants, wind farms, and battery storage systems. Neoen Group is owned by global alternative asset manager Brookfield Corporation.
Case published 17.9.2026
We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi in connection with their investment in VEV, a leading provider of commercial fleet electrification solutions. The investment, led by Jolt Capital with Tesi as co-investor, will support VEV’s next phase of growth and expansion across Europe. As part of the transaction, VEV became an independent company following the acquisition of Vitol’s stake in the business. Founded by Vitol, VEV provides integrated fleet electrification solutions combining fleet strategy, charging infrastructure, energy supply and operational services. Through its VEV IQ platform, the company supports more than 6,000 commercial electric vehicles across Europe and has been deployed across more than 600 sites spanning the transport, logistics and waste sectors. Jolt Capital is a private equity firm focused on growth investments in European deeptech companies. Tesi is a Finnish state-owned investment company that promotes Finnish business and economic growth through investments. We advised Jolt Capital and Tesi on the equity financing and structuring aspects of the transaction. International law firm Goodwin advised the investors on the acquisition of VEV.
Case published 10.9.2026
VR-Group Plc is a transport and logistics group owned by the Finnish State, operating passenger and freight rail transport in Finland with activities also in the Swedish market. VR Group provides passenger, logistics and maintenance services with over 160 years’ experience in developing responsible transport of the future. We advise VR Group in intellectual property matters as part of the company’s wider brand protection efforts. Our assignments have included advice on copyright, design rights and trademarks, focusing on the protection of the company’s visual identity – including its distinctive green colour – in connection with transport services as part of a comprehensive IP protection strategy. VR Group’s consistent brand building has also received recognition, including the Finland Chamber of Commerce’s Brand of the Year award in 2026. In the competition, brands were viewed comprehensively from various perspectives, including their story, strategic role, brand renewal ability and intellectual property protection. The jury found that VR had understood the importance of the protection of its brand as part of a comprehensive business strategy. 
Case published 9.9.2026