23.5.2024

Changes in the construction industry provide good grounds for updating the General Conditions for Building Contracts

The need for updating and reforming the YSE 1998 General Conditions for Building Contracts has been discussed for quite some time in the construction industry. These conditions, which are over 20 years old, have mostly served their purpose for operators in various fields by allowing contracting parties to focus on project-specific terms and conditions during the project preparation phase rather than on the basics. Nevertheless, now is a good time to update the standard conditions now that the construction industry is undergoing significant changes due to the green transition, digitalisation and the reform of the Finnish Building Act.

In Sweden, a project to update the local General Conditions of Contract for Building and Civil Engineering Works and Building Services, which are similar to the Finnish YSE 1998 conditions, has been ongoing for some years. Sweden has also recognised the changed market conditions and the need to clarify ambiguities in the standard conditions, which in some respects are similar to those in Finland. In Sweden, the aim is to have a more consistent set of conditions in order to improve the cost-effectiveness, transparency and predictability of construction.

Case law and the development of the construction industry has resulted in a need to update the the YSE 1998 conditions

One of the special characteristics of the Finnish YSE 1998 conditions is that over the years they have given rise to case law that affects the interpretation of standard conditions and that may have decisive relevance in managing potential disputes concerning a construction contract. This is often a concern, particularly for foreign operators. Now is the time to introduce the principles established in case law into the standard conditions.

Although projects as a rule must be subject to more or less project-specific conditions, general terms and conditions create a predictable environment for the industry operators to manage business risks. Simpler projects will continue to be the main type in the construction market, but as the construction industry evolves, the YSE 1998 conditions will need to be adapted to more complex projects in addition to straight-forward apartment buildings.

The updated conditions could also be differentiated for various types of projects, if necessary. The question could be raised as to whether general terms and conditions should better account for performance guarantees relating to plant and industrial construction, contracts executed using an alliance or project management model and, as in other Nordic countries, construction contracts that include design responsibility.

Negotiations on updating the conditions are in progress

Negotiations on reforming the YSE 1998 conditions between employer and contractor organisations are finally underway. This offers a good opportunity to ensure that the new YSE 1998 conditions will continue to serve various types of projects as well as possible for the next 20 years. 

Latest references

Castrén & Snellman is acting as the legal advisor to the City of Pori in its sale of a 49% stake in Pori Energia to Polhem Infra. Pori Energia, a multi-utility company, operates in various sectors including district heating, electricity distribution, and electricity generation through CHP and renewable sources. The company also provides wind power services and industrial energy solutions in the Satakunta region. This strategic partnership between the City of Pori and Polhem Infra aims to enhance Pori Energia’s financial stability and investment capabilities, enabling the company to further its efforts in the energy transition and continue delivering high-quality energy services to its customers. Polhem Infra, owned by Swedish state pension funds, focuses on investments in critical infrastructure, including renewable electricity generation, energy storage, energy distribution, digital infrastructure, and transport infrastructure. The transaction values Pori Energia at EUR 905 million. 
Case published 31.1.2025
We successfully represented a Finnish manufacturing company in arbitration proceedings under the SCC rules against a global construction company. The dispute was governed by Finnish law and the seat of arbitration was Stockholm, Sweden. The dispute mainly concerned the termination of an erection contract and the right to compensation for delays of the project and for cost increases due to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The main questions in dispute were the lawfulness of the termination of the erection contract as well as the consequences of the termination such as the right to costs to complete the project after termination, the right to liquidated damages for delay of the project and adjustment of contract price due to cost increases. The total value of the dispute exceeded EUR 15 million.
Case published 8.1.2025
We are advising Oomi Oy in a business transaction whereby KSS Energia Oy’s consumer and business customers in the retail sale of electricity will be transferred to Oomi. The transfer is scheduled to take place in March 2025. The arrangement requires approval from the Finnish Competition and Consumer Authority. Oomi Oy is one of the largest energy service companies and electricity sellers in Finland. The arrangement is a result of the recent development of the electricity market and Oomi’s strategy, which aims to offer customers a seamless and improved digital customer experience.
Case published 20.12.2024
We acted as the lead counsel to Fortum in a cross-border transaction in which Fortum sold its recycling and waste business. The business was sold to thematic impact investing firm Summa Equity through its portfolio company NG Group. The debt-free purchase price is approximately EUR 800 million.  Fortum’s recycling and waste business to be sold comprises municipal and industrial waste management and end-to-end plastics, metals, ash, slag and hazardous waste treatment and recycling services. These businesses are located in Finland, Sweden, Denmark and Norway and currently employ approximately 900 employees.
Case published 18.7.2024