14.3.2016

The EU Trade Mark Reform Package – Key Points You Need to Know

Significant changes are on their way for trade mark owners in the EU. With the publication of the EU trade mark reform package in the EU’s Official Journal just before the year-end break, the countdown for the new rules to come in has begun.

The reform package consists of (i) a Regulation (EU) No 2015/2424 amending the existing Community trade mark regulation (the Amending Regulation) as of 23 March 2016 and (ii) a Directive (EU) No 2015/2436 effectively replacing the existing trade mark directive (the Directive). The EU’s Member States are permitted three years to transpose the Directive into national law, with the exception of the envisaged administrative cancellation procedures for which they are given seven years.

Here are the key points you need to know. Special attention is required from owners of EUTMs that have been applied for prior to 22 June 2012 – see section 1 below.

1. Goods and Services Covered by an EUTM

The Amending Regulation favours a literal interpretation of the Nice class headings and thereby confirms the contested IP Translator decision of the Court of Justice of the EU. In practice, this means that Nice class headings will only protect goods or services covered by the literal meaning of that class. This literal approach differs from the more expansive ‘class-heading-covers-all’ approach, which extended protection to all goods or services in a particular class.

This shift in interpretation has the potential to significantly reduce the scope of protection enjoyed by an EUTM applied for prior to 22 June 2012 (effectively prior to the date of the IP Translator decision). The Amending Regulation recognises this by providing a sunset period during which owners of concerned EUTMs ‘may declare that their intention on the date of filing had been to seek protection in respect of goods or services beyond those covered by the literal meaning of the heading of that class’ (Article 28(8) of the Amending Regulation). The sunset period ends on 24 September 2016, and declarations to this effect should be filed by that date accordingly.

All EUTM owners affected by this should carefully review their registrations and consider if any amendments are necessary to protect their rights. If such an owner does not take any action during the sunset period, the scope of their EUTM will be limited to the literal meaning of its class heading.

2. Changes in Terminology

From 23 March 2016 and without any formalities or action from their owners, Community trade marks will be known as European Union trade marks (EUTM). On the same date, the Office for Harmonization of the Internal Market (OHIM), which is the trade marks and designs registry of the EU, will change its name to European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Trade Marks no Longer Need to be Graphically Representable

The removal of the requirement for a trade mark to be graphically representable permits applicants to obtain protection for smells, noises or motions, for example. However, this always requires that their representation is possible in a manner which enables the competent authorities and the public to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded (Article 1(8) of the Amending Regulation).

Any business should carefully consider if it uses any marks that have become eligible for protection as a result of this change.

4. Counterfeits Transiting through the EU

The position of trade mark owners with regards to counterfeited products transiting through the EU has been strengthened significantly. Customs may now seize such counterfeit goods even when their final destination is outside the EU. The owner of the goods may, however, request their release by proving that the trade mark owner cannot prevent the sale of the goods concerned in the country of final destinations.

5. Fee Structure

There will be a reduction in the application fees to register an EUTM. However, the basic fee, set at €850 for electronic filings, will only get you one class of goods and services and no longer three classes for the price of one. Instead, you will now need to pay a surcharge for each additional class. This effectively means that multi-class filing will be more expensive. The upside of this according to the law makers will be more focused trade mark applications and ultimately less unused marks on the EUTM register. 

Renewal fees will also be lowered. If you have many renewals due this year, you may consider if it is possible to defer them until the revised fees are in force on 23 March 2016.

6. Miscellaneous

The reform package also streamlines and harmonises trade mark rules relating to the application procedure at national registries, grounds for refusal or invalidity, infringement, defences and revocation.

As referred to above, the Directive requires Member States to introduce an administrative cancellation procedure for trade marks. This will bring significant benefits for parties who, for example, are seeking revocation of a trade mark or declarations of invalidity. Such procedures will be a viable alternative to lengthy and potentially costly proceedings in national Courts.

Bottom Line

The reform package provides compelling reasons to review your trade mark strategy this year. The minimum each business should do is to consider if any of its EUTM registrations require updating in accordance with point 1 above.


For further information, please contact:

Nina Mikander
Katri Kiviniemi
Sakari Salonen

 

Latest references

We acted as Finnish law legal adviser to the lenders and the export credit agencies in connection with the EUR 514.4 million green project financing for the development and construction of Easpring Finland New Materials Oy’s cathode active material (CAM) manufacturing plant in Kotka, Finland. The borrower, Easpring Finland New Materials Oy, is a joint venture owned by Beijing Easpring Material Technology, Finnish Minerals Group and LG Energy Solution. The financing was provided by six international commercial banks, with Société Générale acting as financial adviser and mandated lead arranger together with Natixis as co-mandated lead arranger, and DNB, ICBC, ING and Standard Chartered participating as lenders, with support from the export credit agencies Finnvera and Sinosure. The project represents a significant milestone for Finland and the European battery value chain by strengthening Europe’s domestic supply of cathode active materials, a key component in lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles and energy storage applications. Once the first phase of the project is operational, the Kotka facility is expected to produce approximately 60,000 tonnes of cathode active material annually, making it one of the largest CAM production plants in Europe and supplying leading battery manufacturers across Europe. 
Case published 21.7.2026
We acted as Finnish legal advisor to Delta Capacity in connection with its acquisition of the ready-to-build Karppio battery energy storage system (BESS) project from Helios Nordic Energy. The acquisition was made and the project will be implemented together with Strioga Family Foundation. The Karppio BESS project is located in Teuva, Finland, and has a capacity of 125 MW / 300 MWh. Delta Capacity will lead the remaining development of the project through to commissioning, planned for 2027, and will serve as long-term asset manager. Delta Capacity is a Swiss-based developer of utility scale battery storage systems. The acquisition adds to Delta Capacity’s growing Nordic portfolio. 
Case published 20.7.2026
We advised Swedbank AB (publ) on the refinancing of a large Finnish retail real estate portfolio owned by Trophi’s Finnish subsidiaries. Trophi is the leading Nordic real estate company focusing on grocery anchored retail properties, with 278 properties across Sweden and Finland. Finland is a market that continues to develop and is also strategically important for Trophi, accounting for approximately 30% of Trophi’s letting and property value.
Case published 17.7.2026
We are acting as Finnish legal advisor to HANZA in connection with its acquisition of Fortaco Finland’s heavy mechanics and assembly business. The transaction is structured as a combined asset and share acquisition and includes Fortaco Finland’s heavy mechanics and assembly operations in Finland, as well as shares in two Estonian and two Polish subsidiaries. The transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2026, subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approvals. Founded in 2008, HANZA is a Swedish mechanical engineering and electronics contract manufacturing company listed on the Nasdaq Stockholm main list. HANZA has approximately 5,000 employees and annual sales of SEK 10 billion. We advise HANZA on this transaction in collaboration with the Swedish law firm Lindahl.
Case published 15.7.2026