14.3.2016

The EU Trade Mark Reform Package – Key Points You Need to Know

Significant changes are on their way for trade mark owners in the EU. With the publication of the EU trade mark reform package in the EU’s Official Journal just before the year-end break, the countdown for the new rules to come in has begun.

The reform package consists of (i) a Regulation (EU) No 2015/2424 amending the existing Community trade mark regulation (the Amending Regulation) as of 23 March 2016 and (ii) a Directive (EU) No 2015/2436 effectively replacing the existing trade mark directive (the Directive). The EU’s Member States are permitted three years to transpose the Directive into national law, with the exception of the envisaged administrative cancellation procedures for which they are given seven years.

Here are the key points you need to know. Special attention is required from owners of EUTMs that have been applied for prior to 22 June 2012 – see section 1 below.

1. Goods and Services Covered by an EUTM

The Amending Regulation favours a literal interpretation of the Nice class headings and thereby confirms the contested IP Translator decision of the Court of Justice of the EU. In practice, this means that Nice class headings will only protect goods or services covered by the literal meaning of that class. This literal approach differs from the more expansive ‘class-heading-covers-all’ approach, which extended protection to all goods or services in a particular class.

This shift in interpretation has the potential to significantly reduce the scope of protection enjoyed by an EUTM applied for prior to 22 June 2012 (effectively prior to the date of the IP Translator decision). The Amending Regulation recognises this by providing a sunset period during which owners of concerned EUTMs ‘may declare that their intention on the date of filing had been to seek protection in respect of goods or services beyond those covered by the literal meaning of the heading of that class’ (Article 28(8) of the Amending Regulation). The sunset period ends on 24 September 2016, and declarations to this effect should be filed by that date accordingly.

All EUTM owners affected by this should carefully review their registrations and consider if any amendments are necessary to protect their rights. If such an owner does not take any action during the sunset period, the scope of their EUTM will be limited to the literal meaning of its class heading.

2. Changes in Terminology

From 23 March 2016 and without any formalities or action from their owners, Community trade marks will be known as European Union trade marks (EUTM). On the same date, the Office for Harmonization of the Internal Market (OHIM), which is the trade marks and designs registry of the EU, will change its name to European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

3. Trade Marks no Longer Need to be Graphically Representable

The removal of the requirement for a trade mark to be graphically representable permits applicants to obtain protection for smells, noises or motions, for example. However, this always requires that their representation is possible in a manner which enables the competent authorities and the public to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded (Article 1(8) of the Amending Regulation).

Any business should carefully consider if it uses any marks that have become eligible for protection as a result of this change.

4. Counterfeits Transiting through the EU

The position of trade mark owners with regards to counterfeited products transiting through the EU has been strengthened significantly. Customs may now seize such counterfeit goods even when their final destination is outside the EU. The owner of the goods may, however, request their release by proving that the trade mark owner cannot prevent the sale of the goods concerned in the country of final destinations.

5. Fee Structure

There will be a reduction in the application fees to register an EUTM. However, the basic fee, set at €850 for electronic filings, will only get you one class of goods and services and no longer three classes for the price of one. Instead, you will now need to pay a surcharge for each additional class. This effectively means that multi-class filing will be more expensive. The upside of this according to the law makers will be more focused trade mark applications and ultimately less unused marks on the EUTM register. 

Renewal fees will also be lowered. If you have many renewals due this year, you may consider if it is possible to defer them until the revised fees are in force on 23 March 2016.

6. Miscellaneous

The reform package also streamlines and harmonises trade mark rules relating to the application procedure at national registries, grounds for refusal or invalidity, infringement, defences and revocation.

As referred to above, the Directive requires Member States to introduce an administrative cancellation procedure for trade marks. This will bring significant benefits for parties who, for example, are seeking revocation of a trade mark or declarations of invalidity. Such procedures will be a viable alternative to lengthy and potentially costly proceedings in national Courts.

Bottom Line

The reform package provides compelling reasons to review your trade mark strategy this year. The minimum each business should do is to consider if any of its EUTM registrations require updating in accordance with point 1 above.


For further information, please contact:

Nina Mikander
Katri Kiviniemi
Sakari Salonen

 

Latest references

Castrén & Snellman advised Nscale, a European AI infrastructure company, in connection with its planned data centre project in Harjavalta, Finland. The facility will be located in the Sievari industrial area. Castrén & Snellman’s advisory role encompassed the negotiation and execution of a site securing and development agreement (SSDA) with Fortum, as well as the preliminary land sale process for the Sievari site with the Town of Harjavalta. Under the SSDA, Fortum supports the advancement of Nscale’s project development, including grid connection design and permitting.
Case published 15.4.2026
We are acting as legal adviser to Taaleri Plc on its acquisition of a 51 per cent ownership stake in Nordic Science Investments Oy (NSI), marking Taaleri’s expansion into deeptech-driven venture capital. Through the transaction, Taaleri broadens its private equity offering into early-stage venture capital funds as well as the commercialisation and scaling of research-driven innovations. NSI is a Finnish venture capital fund manager operating across the Nordic and Baltic regions, focusing on early-stage investments in research- and science-based technologies. Its portfolio companies develop, among other things, health technologies, life sciences, advanced materials and AI-driven solutions. In addition to providing growth capital, NSI supports spin-out companies with strategic guidance, access to networks and assistance in building teams during the early phases of business development. NSI’s first fund, the EUR 45 million NSI Nordic Science I Ky, was established in 2024 and has to date invested in 22 early-stage companies in Finland, Sweden and the Baltic countries. Taaleri is a specialist in investments, private asset management and non-life insurance, with a strong position in renewable energy, bioindustry and housing investments as well as credit risk insurance. Taaleri has EUR 2.7 billion of assets under management in its private equity funds, co-investments and single-asset vehicles, employs approximately 130 people and is listed on Nasdaq Helsinki. The founders of NSI will continue in their operational roles following the transaction. The completion of the transaction is subject to approval by the FIN-FSA.
Case published 13.4.2026
We delivered two information design workshops for the legal department of the Finnish Centre for Pensions, with participants from both legal and other professional backgrounds. In the sessions, we applied the principles of legal design thinking to the Finnish Centre for Pensions’ field of operation and background materials, also utilising AI as a design tool. The participants found the tailored training highly useful and commended the trainers for their in-depth familiarisation with the Centre’s opinion drafting process and operating environment. As a result of the workshops, our experts proposed a new structural and linguistic model for the legal department of the Finnish Centre for Pensions for drafting opinions and guidelines. The proposal was well received as clear and applicable to the participants’ everyday work. In addition, we presented tailored AI use cases to support experts, allowing for a more efficient AI-assisted way of working. Our experts who delivered the workshops combined their legal expertise with their leading experience in legal design. The participants appreciated this versatile expertise, which enabled a knowledgeable, creative and applied approach to legal writing. ‘C&S created a well-structured training tailored to our needs, providing clear direction for our organisation and concrete takeaways for our experts in their day-to-day work,’ says Mari Kuunvalo, Head Of the Legal Department at the Finnish Centre for Pensions.
Case published 10.4.2026
We advised Aktia Bank Plc on the issuance of an EUR 80 million Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bond. The bond pays a fixed interest rate of 6.75 per cent semi-annually. The bond is perpetual, and Aktia has the right to redeem or repurchase it in accordance with the terms of the bond, subject to certain conditions. The bond was issued on 1 April 2026. In addition, we assisted Aktia in listing the bond on the Nasdaq Helsinki Ltd stock exchange. For the listing, we prepared Finland’s first EU Follow-on prospectus for a bond. The EU Follow-on prospectus was introduced on 5 March 2026 with an update to the Prospectus Regulation (EU) No. 2017/1129. The EU Follow-on prospectus is a new type of prospectus that can be used, among others, by issuers whose securities have been admitted to trading on a regulated market continuously for at least the 18 months preceding the offer to the public or the admission to trading on a regulated market of the new securities. A follow-on prospectus is simpler than a so-called traditional prospectus, and it is intended to avoid repeating information that the issuer has already disclosed. Nordea Bank Abp acts as the sole structuring advisor for the issue of the Notes. Nordea Bank Abp, Danske Bank A/S and ABN Amro Bank N.V. act as the lead managers for the issue of the Notes. 
Case published 7.4.2026