2.3.2021

Eija Warma-Lehtinen Invited to Serve as Professor of Practice at University of Lapland

Castrén & Snellman Partner and Member of the Finnish Bar Association Eija Warma-Lehtinen has been invited to serve as a professor of practice at the University of Lapland.

‘I accept this professorship with a happy and curious mind. It is wonderful to return to the University of Lapland to teach and share my expertise with students and the faculty’, Eija said.

Eija will handle the professorship alongside her normal work. The duties of the professorship are to study the connections between law, data and technology.

‘The links between law, data and technology are extremely interesting and are at the heart of every organisation. Understanding these matters is vital for every law student’, Eija said.

‘I also hope to help build bridges between academia and the business world, so that academic expertise could be put to even better use in various organisations’, she continued.

Eija heads Castrén & Snellman’s Data Protection & Privacy service and co-heads the firm’s Compliance and & Investigations service.

She is a forerunner in the field of data protection in Finland. She has been ranked amongst Finland’s leading lawyers by a number of publications and has been listed as one of the top 100 technology influencers in Finland. Eija is also a respected lecturer.

She graduated from the Faculty of Law University of Lapland in 2004. In 2020, the University of Lapland named her Alumni of the Year.

People with professional merits and experience of particular significance from outside the academic world may be invited to the position of professor of practice.  The professorship is part time with a 20% workload and the appointment is until the end of 2022.

Eija is Castrén & Snellman’s second professor of practice. Tuomas Lehtinen, who is a partner in our International Construction & Projects service, is serving as Professor of Practice in Advocacy in the University of Helsinki for the period of 2018–2022.

Latest references

Castrén & Snellman acted as legal advisor to Suomen Aurinkovoima Oy and its owners in a financing tender process and a financing arrangement implemented with Danske Bank to secure financing for the company’s future solar park projects. Suomen Aurinkovoima, established by Oulun Seudun Sähkö, Oulun Energia, Vantaan Energia and Savon Voima, is a company focused on increasing domestic solar power. The company manages solar park projects from planning to implementation and maintenance, and its goal is to build dozens of new solar parks across Finland by 2030.
Case published 22.10.2025
We advised DNB Bank ASA in its agreement with Fennia Mutual Insurance Company on the development and lease of the premises at Fabianinkatu 8, Helsinki. With the lease agreement, DNB Bank ASA will focus all its Finnish operations at the Fabian 8 office. The other tenants at the renewed premises will be DNB Carnegie Investment Bank AB’s Finnish operations and DNB Auto Finance Oy. In connection with the long-term lease agreement, the parties also agreed on a major renovation project to completely refurbish the premises. The object of lease will be completed in the second half of 2027.
Case published 10.10.2025
We advised Yellow Film Studios, the largest independent film and television production company in the Nordics, in its strategic merger with Danish film industry sales and financing studio REinvent Studios. Together they form Reinvent Yellow, a unified hub for television and film production, sales, financing and innovation, combining over three decades of production experience and a vast catalogue of titles.
Case published 8.10.2025
We successfully represented a panel of reinsurance companies in an international ad hoc arbitration. The dispute arose out of a reinsurance treaty under the terms of which the reinsurers had reinsured a portfolio of risks underwritten by the cedent. The parties disagreed as to whether the reinsurance provided coverage for a certain loss that had occurred because of the market turmoil caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The case involved highly complex legal and contractual questions requiring special expertise on reinsurance law and practice. The arbitral tribunal rejected the counterparty’s claims for reinsurance compensation against our clients in full. The amount in dispute was approximately EUR 34 million.
Case published 16.9.2025